The right to clean air

The right to clean air

The recent Clean Air Forum in Canberra brought together stakeholders across various disciplines to discuss the next steps to improving indoor air quality. AIRAH attended as a peak engineering body.

Clean indoor air was the focus of a recent full-day event at Parliament House in Canberra that brought together leaders from public health, engineering, architecture, law, economics and politics to discuss the state of play and the
way forward. AIRAH CEO Trish Hyde and advocacy lead Mark Vender both attended the event.

The Clean Air Forum was opened by Australia’s Chief Health Officer Professor Paul Kelly, who confirmed that indoor air quality is a priority for government. At the same time, he counselled the attendees to build a solid economic case for any action.

“We need to constantly ask ourselves, ‘Where is the evidence that whatever we are proposing actually works?’,” said Professor Kelly. “What represents the best value for money?”

The speakers took up that challenge, highlighting the benefits for all Australians of better indoor air.

Engineering at the forefront 

Ventilation was a theme throughout the event, with many speakers highlighting the role engineers will play.

Professor Brett Sutton, Victoria’s chief health officer, acknowledged that changing ongoing behaviour is difficult.

“Engineering solutions need to lead the way, because they don’t rely on behavioural interventions,” said Sutton.

That message was echoed by Professor Geoff Hanmer, Adjunct Professor of Architecture at the University of Adelaide.

He characterised COVID-19 as a “pandemic of buildings”, because that’s where transmission is taking place. Like Sutton, he recommended reliable engineering solutions over unpredictable human interventions.

Hanmer pointed to the vexed situation with natural ventilation in Australia’s building code, where buildings may be compliant in theory, but very poorly ventilated in reality, because occupants do not open windows and doors.

“Thermal comfort always trumps ventilation,” he said, explaining the behaviour.

Mechanical ventilation, Professor Hanmer noted, does provide adequate indoor air quality if it is designed in compliance with the National Construction Code – and specifically AS 1668.2. However, many of these systems are
not properly maintained, meaning they don’t operate as designed. He suggested that regulations could be put in place to mandate maintenance.

Design v operation 

The issue of design verses operation was taken up by Professor Lidia Morawska from QUT, who is leading the ARC Training Centre for Advanced Building Systems Against Airborne Infection Transmission.

She put forward the view that – as is the case with outdoor air – there must be both standards and monitoring in place. Key to this is the introduction of an Australian standard that sets threshold levels for pollutants in indoor air. This would include pollutants that are significant in terms of health impact, and can also be practically measured, such as PM2.5, CO2 and CO.

AIRAH CEO Trish Hyde noted that the AIRAH Indoor Air Quality Special Technical Group has submitted a proposal to Standards Australia along these lines.

But even with a standard in place, the question remains how it would be enforced.

One option could be through occupational health and safety laws. Leading employment lawyer Louise Houlihan pointed out that a framework for ensuring good ventilation already exists under WHS laws.

According to Houlihan, a number of COVID-19 claims have been paid, and employers are actively looking for advice on how to meet their obligations. This reinforced another common theme during the event: the need to raise
awareness and provide clear, reliable advice.

The cost of inaction 

The panellists gave many different answers to Professor Kelly’s opening question of cost and benefit, but the consensus was that the latter far outweighs the former.

Clinical epidemiologist, surgeon and health services researcher Professor Nancy Baxter quoted a pre-pandemic figure for the cost of unsafe air – the “cost of doing nothing” – as $12 billion a year. But she stressed that it was about more than money.

“We cannot not breathe, we cannot not share air,” she said. “Clean air is a public good. It is a right.”

Like to know more?

For more information about AIRAH’s advocacy activities, positions and submissions, go to


This article appears in ecolibrium’s May 2023 issue

Want to read more?


Click here to view our archive of issues and features.


Become an AIRAH member or subscribe to Ecolibrium.

Breakfast of champions

Breakfast of champions

At the recent Women of AIRAH breakfast, attendees were challenged to be agents of change for greater equity, diversity and inclusion in our sector."Are you a morning person?” asked presenter Lisa Martello at the Women of AIRAH breakfast, held before the second day’s...

Seeking star performers

Seeking star performers

Awards, celebrating distinguished contributions in Australia’s HVAC&R and building services sector. Awards are handed out in six categories: young achiever, product excellence, software/digital excellence, project excellence, outstanding industry...

Red revolution

Red revolution

M3 Melbourne is one of two data centres in the Victorian capital that are set to house Australia’s largest and most comprehensive cloud ecosystem. Constructed by Kapitol Group, M3 Melbourne, a 100,000m² data centre in West Footscray, and M2 Melbourne, a 16,000m² data...

The heat is on

The heat is on

An El Niño weather event has been declared, amid realisation that 2023 appears likely to be the hottest year on record. Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology has formally declared an El Niño weather event, meaning one is under way for the first time in eight years. El...

One smart building, please

One smart building, please

Desiring to use actionable data from our buildings is undoubtedly a good thing. To effectively do this, however, defining terms and allocating responsibility for tasks is essential – especially when the “smarts” from our edifices exist in the space between systems.

Powering a smarter future

Powering a smarter future

What role does data play in the electrification of buildings? With a focus on machine learning, artificial intelligence and the interaction with the electricity grid, a panel at AIRAH’s recent Building Date Forum explored this fascinating topic.